Search for: "Kimbrough v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
In an important and lengthy new opinion, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
Yesterday, the First Circuit announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:30 pm
Pho, 433 F.3d 53 (2006) (our coverage here) remains vital after Kimbrough v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 8:16 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:34 pm
United States its special speedy issue on Rita. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:04 pm
However, post-Kimbrough v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Big wins for the accused included the ability of federal judges to depart from the federal sentencing guidelines in crack cocaine cases (Kimbrough and Gall), and of state courts to retroactively apply Supreme Court decisions to criminals seeking post-conviction relief even where federal judges cannot (Danforth).The Court gave wins to both prosecutors and defense attorneys. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING US v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:29 pm
Here is the abstract: When the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
For the court's earlier opinion in the case see United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
Inspired by the Supreme Court's holding in Kimbrough v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:45 pm
Rita v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
In his concurring opinion, Justice Thomas reiterated - as he did in his Kimbrough dissent earlier this term - that there is no principled way to apply the Booker remedy, and thus that the Guidelines should be mandatory. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:05 pm
The District Court held that under United States v. [read post]
