Search for: "Kimbrough v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States and Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:57 pm
Professor Scott uses a unique dataset from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to examine how judges have handled their new sentencing freedom as a result of cases such as Booker, Kimbrough, and Gall. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
United States, which recognized district courts' authority to vary from the crack guidelines based solely on a policy disagreement, and not simply on individualized determination that guidelines yield excessive sentence in a particular caseReported at 21 Fla. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
United States Can Co., 131 F. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:06 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
The Court further held that the Supreme Court’s holding in Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gomez-Herrera, No. 07-10153 A sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over a primary claim that Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
However, defendants' sentences are remanded for reconsideration on the issue of the crack/powder cocaine disparity in light of Kimbrough. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
