Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
Superior Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:19 pm
The court of appeals agreed, holding in State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:30 am
Here are a few cases filed in San Francisco Superior Court during the past couple of weeks. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
In the case of Fernandes v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 10:40 am
Recently, the Fourth District court has published a decision in Wills v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Egan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:27 am
See Griffin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:39 pm
As Justice Brown stated in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:26 am
The father then appealed the NJ Municipal Court’s decision and the NJ Superior Court reversed the Municipal Court’s decision, and the NJ Appellate Division confirmed the reversal. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Superior Court (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 864, 876, 269 Cal.Rptr. 647; Grant v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The Superior Court and the Maine Supreme Court rejected this argument. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
In Ghanny v. 498326 Ontario Limited, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was faced with a question that has become all too common in these difficult market conditions. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:53 am
Chin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:31 am
The post does not mention federal Indian law, or Adoptive Parents v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 4:31 pm
Rippy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Judge Caputo noted that a federal judge in the Eastern District Federal Court had ruled in 2009 that these kinds of policy terms were enforceable and not inconsistent with the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, relying upon case law from the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
(Dissenting Op. by Lazarus, J.).In Farese, the Pennsylvania Superior Court held, in what appears to be the first appellate decision of its kind, that future medical expenses need not be reduced in accordance with Act 6 before being presented to the jury at trial in an auto accident case. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:25 am
Curiously, the Court takes on a ruling in 2008 by another panel of the Superior Court in Billhime v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:08 am
(Superior) v. [read post]
