Search for: "King v. Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 6:45 am
Above is an introductory video on King v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Commentators have been weighing in since the Supreme Court decided it would hear King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
For the big victories of the Civil Rights Movement, we think of Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:26 am
After becoming the NAACP's chief legal counsel in 1938, Thurgood Marshall won several landmark court cases in the late 1940's and early 1950's banning segregation, including Brown v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
UPDATE:As I suspected, Justice Scalia did not say he would have dissented in Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
Mark's post below about the Parents Involved case and the argument over the meaning of Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:41 am
In his speech “Give us the Ballot,” delivered on the third anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm
Civil Rights”—Motley litigated hundreds of cases that remade American law and society, including Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Three Lessons We've Learned From Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
Last week, in summarizing our discussion of Plessy and Brown v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
Brown’s counsel, Janet Somes. [read post]
1 May 2011, 5:16 pm
Texas (2003) as the Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:26 pm
Mac Clayton offers this perspective on KQED radio: In 1951, before Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm
Mother and daughter on the steps of the Supreme Court soon after it decided Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Cir. 2014)/King v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm
Destroying property is generally a seizure of that property, Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
In 1994, the Supreme Court referred to its King dictum in Brown v. [read post]