Search for: "King v. Cardin" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm by Paul Caron
Kay Bell (Don't Mess With Taxes), Ohio Bill to Make Feminine Hygiene Products Sales Tax-Free Bloomberg, Marriage Ruling Ends Tax Confusion for Gay Couples Bloomberg, VAT Chance: Rand Paul, Ben Cardin Push to Change Tax Code Bloomberg BNA, King v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal judgment from Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 437 (25 March 2021) is here. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
He was received by the pope with marked courtesy and was appointed grand penitentiary of England, but his argument, if discussed, did not lead to any practical decision of the divorce question.In 1532 he was sent to Germany, officially as ambassador to the emperor Charles V but with instructions to establish contact with the Lutheran princes. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
”  Commentary on the ruling comes from Nicholas Bagley at The Incidental Economist, who suggests that “the stakes of the lawsuit are high—not as high as King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:17 am by Asbestos Litigation
Luke in Antwerp, and shortly after, around 1548, attracted the attention of Cardinal Granvela, Bishop of Arras, who became his patron, and presented to Emperor Charles V. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Consistency is a cardinal judicial virtue, but not the only virtue. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm by Buce
  The Colonna, for example: "their" Pope, Martin V, born Odo Colonna, is the earliest of the lot; his incumbency extended from 1417 to 1431, effectively ending the great schism. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]