Search for: "King v. Correspondent Dept"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
What Consitutes Prejudice to a Liability Insurer? A Default Judgment Taken Against its Insured Does.
11 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
Co. v Rechev of Brooklyn, Inc., 57 AD3d 257, 259). [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
Term, 2nd Dept., decided 1/9/2009)Appeal from a Kings Civil judgment for plaintiff on its motion for summary judgment.REVERSED and plaintiff's motion denied. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
”); Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures LLC, 46 AD3d 423, 424-25 (1st Dept 2007) (“mere speculation” insufficient to demonstrate proximate cause). [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am
(Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
In Geiling v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Spancrete Machine Corp., 278 AD2d 867, 868 [4th Dept 2000]; Silverstein v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
Also, the legal fee must bear a reasonable relationship to the size of the estate (Matter of Kaufmann, 26 AD2d 818 [1st Dept. 1966], affd 23 NY2d 700 [1968]; Martin v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
See Bluebird Partners, L.P. v First Fidelity Bank, N.A., New Jersey, 248 AD2d 219, 225 (1st Dept. 1998). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
McGraw Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 46 Misc3d 561 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2014] [discussed here]). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
First, the First and Second Departments once held that “[t]he right to an accounting is premised upon the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship and a breach of the duty imposed by that relationship respecting property in which the party seeking the accounting has an interest” (Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608 [2d Dept 2017] [quoting Palazzo v Palazzo, 121 AD2d 261, 265 [1st Dept 1986]]). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Ct., Kings County] ), and warrant the denial of summary judgment sought by the party accused of adulterous behavior. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
Dept. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
AUTO – GRAVES AMENDMENT – RENTED VEHICLE – MOTION TO DISMISS – INSUFFICIENT EVIDENTIARY FOUNDATION FOR AUTHENTICATING RENTAL AGREEMENT AS A BUSINESS RECORD Merine v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
