Search for: "King v. County of Nassau" Results 61 - 80 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Kings County Domestic Violence Attorneys, Nassau County Child Support Attorneys and Stephen Bilkis and Associates protect the rights of children. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
” Perhaps because of the difficulties in proving -- post-mortem -- a decedent’s sexual activity, disqualification cases grounded in allegations of constructive abandonment are few and far between (see, e.g., Matter of Reisman, N.Y.L.J., Feb. 8, 2000, p.33, col. 3 [Sur Ct, Nassau County 2000]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
Nassau County Probate Lawyers said the other witness, CF, stated that the proponent also asked her to witness a document for the decedent, but she was never told that the document was a will. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Re, 2013 NY Slip Op 51062(U) (Sup Ct Kings County July 5, 2013) (David I. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Underlying the parties’ 2008 divorce judgment, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky imputed gross annual income to the father of $259,100.00. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Spencer L. Reames
 Surrogate McCarty quoted the decision of Matter of Anonymous (174 Misc 2d 333 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1997]), which described persons acquitted of a crime via the insanity defense as occupying a special class. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:08 pm by John Hochfelder
That argument was made because it’s widely thought that the Second Department (hearing appeals from 10 downstate counties such as Kings, Queens, Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester) is less likely than the First Department (which hears appeals from the Bronx and Manhattan) to allow higher verdicts to stand and more likely to order a reduction. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
For example, a judgment against the State was upheld in National Westminster Bank, USA v State of New York, where the Bronx County Clerk, acting in his role as Clerk of the Supreme Court, failed to timely docket a judgment obtained by the claimant in Nassau County. [read post]