Search for: "King v. Lambert"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr David Stone) Re Wong Lo Kat Trade Mark, Multi-Access Ltd v Guanghzhou Wong Lo Kat Great Health Business Development Co Ltd. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
This is what happened last week:* When words mean what they say: Bob Marley copyrights stay where they areKatfriend and occasional contributor Dorothea Thompson reports on BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a 18 November ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, applying the principles of contractual interpretation in the context of a fairly complex music copyright assignments involving some the much-missed… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
This is the reason why Jeremy tries to suggest a creative way for King Blatty’s empire to get up again after the (more) recent scandals. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:53 am
Even if such a policy had been violated, under the circumstances of this case, such violation would not constitute actionable negligence (see Lambert v Bracco, 18 AD3d 619, 620; Newsome v Cservak, 130 AD2d 637, 638). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
She has now learned that the EPO has responded in the form of an email sent by Mr Guillaume Minnoye, Vice-President of Directorate General 1, which Merpel leaks here in all its majestic unbelievability.* No pain for Actavis: Warner-Lambert fail to stop launch of generic pregabalinSecond medical use claims, skinny labels, and public policy issues around healthcare are the topics addressed in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015]… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
Authored by Josh King. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
In relation to the ECHR arguments, Lady Black noted that Lambert v France (App No. 46043/14) (2016) 62 EHRR 2, demonstrated that the ECtHR did not regard it as problematic, in principle, that a decision to withhold or withdraw CANH from a patient with PDOC should be made by a doctor, without obligatory court involvement. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
***** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., 178 Cal.App.3d 632 (1986) and King v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
And the Court also appears to have added King v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
With the use of “(cleaned up)” in the recent Brownback v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners… [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm
Martin Luther King Jr.: “Take the first step in faith. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Feb. 2, 2012) (“argument[s] that the hospital is a product seller would have profound negative impact upon the services provided by a hospital to members of the public”; “the hospital is not selling the product but is offering the service”); Lambert v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:47 pm
Here are a few tips to keep in mind when helping out after the storms: Cash is king. [read post]
