Search for: "King v. Nixon" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 5:48 am by jonathanturley
As I previously noted, it has been almost 50 years since the high court ruled presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits in Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
The case is being heard today before Judges Carolyn Dineen King, Stuart Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
v=dqsJbfWGXGEVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” (Reminiscent of Richard Nixon’s Watergate-era speech in which he said, “I am not a crook. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 4, 2021, we discussed the First Amendment arguments in the House of Representatives' Managers' trial memorandum. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Angus King has quipped, “one throat to choke” on cyber issues. [read post]