Search for: "King v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
One of the named parties, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and her entourage of a few aides and security personnel passed through. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
H.R.2535 - To elevate the position of Director of the Indian Health Service within the Department of Health and Human Services to Assistant Secretary for Indian Health, and for other purposes. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
The biggest media story of the week was the Sun’s publication of a photograph (and subsequently a video) of the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock in a “steamy clinch” with an aide. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
This blog’s Lyle Denniston reports on a letter by Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell, responding to a question from a member of Congress, in which she indicates that the federal government “would have no way to fix ‘the massive damage’” if the Court were to strike down the subsidies. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris said that it was unfortunate that the Westminster Government had been forced to commission services that should be a matter for the Department of Health to implement; however, it had been left with no other option. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a State; so an Exchange established by the Secretary is not an Exchange established by the State; so people who buy insurance through such an Exchange get no money. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
King Charles addressed the summit and Sunak hosted a chat with Tesla and X Chairman, Elon Musk. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
” Religion and COVID-19 in British Columbia In Beaudoin v British Columbia (Attorney General) 2022 BCCA 427, the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld orders of British Columbia’s Provincial Health Officer [PHO] in 2020 and 2021 prohibiting in-person worship services. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
Recorder Karl King. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
If a State chooses not to follow the directive in Section 18031 to establish an Exchange, the Act tells the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish “such Exchange. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:07 am
Currently, Title 42 United States Code Section 264 charges the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with "preventing the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States and within the United States and its territories/possessions. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
(i) Those who can’t afford coverage; (ii) taxpayers below the poverty line; (iii) members of Indian tribes; (iv) individuals experiencing “short coverage gaps” in health insurance; and (v) persons who’ve received a “hardship” exemption from the Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
