Search for: "King v. State Bar (1990)"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 6:17 am
From the King County Bar Association Law Bulletin: State v Shale – Supreme Court Moves Washington in the Wrong Tribal Direction A somewhat random excerpt: The Court’s opinion is primarily based on its wholly mistaken belief that when Public Law 280 was passed by Congress in the 1950s and enacted and amended by Washington in the 1960s, “neither this state nor the federal government would have understood that… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:20 am
" King had served since 1990 as Mazak's Vice President and Controller. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm
United States Supreme Court – KING ET AL. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
This is a very high bar and amounts to only a sanity test. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
King, in which they will decide whether a ruling for the government in a Federal Tort Claims Act case bars a lawsuit under Bivens against the employees involved. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613 (1st Dept. 1990). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
To take but one very significant example: In 1990, the Bush Administration permitted employers to hire 1.5 million undocumented spouses and children of aliens, pursuant to its "Family Fairness" program. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
Many of the more senior among the current prescription medical product liability defense bar cut our teeth during the vaccine wars of the 1980s/1990s. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Schiavo, 162 A.D.2d 639, 556 N.Y.S.2d 954 [2d Dept 1990], lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 864 [1990]).People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Div. 1990) cert. den. 127 N.J. 321 (1991); see also State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
Socony Mobil Oil Co. (1964) 231 Cal.App.2d 188 and King v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
King, 552 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
King, 552 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
The holding in Adams – that the strict liability claims were barred by the statute of limitations applicable to malpractice claims – is suggestive that no separate cause of action for strict liability exists, but that’s not the ruling. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Carnival Cruise Lines, Case No. 19-cv-21725-KING (S.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
