Search for: "King v. State of California (1970)" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 11:37 am by Moria Miller
”Parrish, a partner at the Washington, D.C. office of international law firm King & Spalding and a member of its national appellate and strategic counseling practice group, was involved with the landmark Coleman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” In fact, the question that Rodney King posed was not “can’t we get along? [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
New York, unlike other states (such as California), does not grant divorces based on irreconcilable differences. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[9] See, e.g., Geoffrey Sawer, Modern Federalism 1 –2 (1969); Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism 207 –08 (1970); Preston King, Federalism and Federation 60 (! [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
In Washington state Heller Ehrman wrote an amicus brief on behalf of a group of historians in the same-sex marriage case, Andersen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Regents of the University of California (and later Grutter v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
When students at a California high school tried to elect a lesbian couple as prom king and queen, school officials issued a royal edict that for all-important prom purposes, qualification for “king” or “queen” is defined by sex at birth. [read post]