Search for: "King v. State of California (1970)"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
And after talking about State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area… [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
In Washington state Heller Ehrman wrote an amicus brief on behalf of a group of historians in the same-sex marriage case, Andersen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:43 pm
The King can do no wrong? [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
New York, unlike other states (such as California), does not grant divorces based on irreconcilable differences. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
The supreme court succinctly summarized the court of appeals' position on the validity of default judgments, stating: "The Court of Appeals correctly recognized that "[a] default judgment is just as conclusive an adjudication and as binding upon the parties of whatever is essential to support the judgment as one which has been rendered following answer and contest," citing Perry & Derrick Co, Inc v King, 24 Mich App 616, 620 (1970). [read post]
