Search for: "King v. State of Texas*#"
Results 21 - 40
of 726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm
IRS was only the second majority opinion to cite NFIB, after King v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:56 am
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Tucker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Breyer, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:11 am
I'v even blogged about it before. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:42 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week agreed to hear arguments in Ex Parte Terrell to determine whether the Supreme Court's Miller v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm
In Cleve Foster v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 3:26 pm
Second, King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Greg Abbott, Attorney General for the State of Texas, No. 11? [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in its 2013 decision in the case of Crane v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
Under this doctrine, states, counties, and cities were immune from suit based on a tradition of English common law referred to as “rex non potest peccare,” which meant “the king can do no wrong. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
TEXAS SUPREME COURT PER CURIM OPINION IN COMPANION CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ------------ NO. 13-0576 ------------ THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P., PETITIONER, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
Harvard, "established by the state" means "established by the federal government" in King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
King v. [read post]
