Search for: "King v. State of Texas*#"
Results 61 - 80
of 726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 6:45 pm
Texas' position follows from the United States Supreme Court's 1979 opinion in Friedman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” The policy at the center of the case, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:29 am
State, 495 S.W.3d 374, 392 (Tex. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
King. 1. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:02 pm
The Sport of Kings. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
King, 131 S. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
As the Court has shown us time and again in its immunity jurisprudence, the government can do no wrong, because the government -- like the King -- is sovereign. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 7:39 am
King California v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will consider the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions process. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
However, that court left the act in place pending appeal (Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:05 am
Mata East Texas City Entitled to Immunity in Crash Involving Assistant Chief of Police – Lara v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:05 am
Mata East Texas City Entitled to Immunity in Crash Involving Assistant Chief of Police – Lara v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm
Texas Supreme Court Ruling in King The key case in this area of law is a 2002 decision by the Texas Supreme Court in King v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
As the Court has shown us time and again in its immunity jurisprudence, the government can do no wrong, because the government -- like the King -- is sovereign. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
-EV]Part I of this series placed Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
King (2006) This 2006 order from the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
