Search for: "King v. Stuart" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 3:35 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King, Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Stuart-Smith) Yours Naturally Naturally Yours Ltd v Kate McVier Skin Ltd and another [2023] EWCA Civ 1493 (19 Dec 2023)This was an appeal by the defendants, Kate McIver Skin Limited ("KMS") and Christopher McIver (the personal representative and widower of Kate McIver ("Mrs McIver") the founder of KMS) [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
In an action to permanently enjoin alleged violations of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York, the defendant Robert Cunningham appealed from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, which, granted the motion of nonparty Stuart A. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:50 am
Grant, The Once and Future King: Sovereignty over Territory and the Annex VII Tribunal’s Award in Mauritius v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:47 pm by ernst
Supreme Court's recent Eighth Amendment decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
It’s part of the reason why the challengers in King v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:35 am
 Thus it was that this Kat made his way to the normally unpromising terrain of the Technology and Construction Court for England and Wales, where he found Noemalife SPA v Infinitt UK Ltd [2013] EWHC 2376 (TCC) a very much fact-driven decision of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart [Merpel finds this name perplexing: England, by itself or together with other bits of the British Isles, has had at least eight kings called Edward -- nine if you count Edward the Confessor… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am by Ilya Somin
The 17th century Stuart kings, in particular, were criticized for using large fines to raise revenue, harass their political foes, and indefinitely detain those unable to pay.... [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Niska and Arneson v. 281 Care Committee); A conversion therapy case (King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The 17th century Stuart kings, in particular, were criticized for using large fines to raise revenue, harass their political foes, and indefinitely detain those unable to pay. [read post]