Search for: "King v. United States Government CASE TRANSFERRED" Results 1 - 20 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
However, it was made in 1998, when the Court heard Quality King v L’anza, a case involving similar issues concerning the first sale doctrine and § 602. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — federal court authority to require the government to transfer guns seized from an individual without a legal right to have a gun Tibble v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am by azatty
Here are some of the seminal decisions they’ll cover: King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
  DELINQUENT TAX REMEDIES   The King Law Reporter January 2018 # 2   Hosted by Fastcase.com & The Morgan King Company Providing prompt notice of new cases, emerging issues, and other timely and important information for professionals who deal with delinquent taxes. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
Va., 2017) See King’s Discharging Taxes in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases, at ¶ 3.11(f)(4), ¶ 3.13. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]