Search for: "King v. Virginia"
Results 121 - 140
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 5:10 pm
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and Rebecca Beach SMITH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
Rounds, 267 Va. 277 (2004); King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
In King v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
King v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 1:52 pm
LEXIS 178028 (ED VA, Dec. 21, 2016), a Virginia federal district court dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's claims that he was denied religious feasts of his "Common Wealth of Israel" faith.In Colliton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
EPA, and King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:42 am
The justices will then hear oral argument in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 6:22 am
In the 1859 case Ableman v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Warren Bridge and Briscoe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
King, 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
King, 2016 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 12:21 am
I read over the amicus brief filed by the Virginia Attorney General and others in the case of King v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 7:11 am
King has been covered by this blog. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
We are in Virginia where the contract is king so I’m not sure that such a clause, correctly drafted, would not be enforced. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
King, conference not yet set. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Oregon, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was not within his wheelhouse when he regulated health care tax credits in King v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am
Jackson Lecture (video) at the Chautauqua Institution, discussing (among other things) the Court’s decisions in King v. [read post]
