Search for: "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co." Results 81 - 100 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111, 149 (2d Cir.2010), aff’d on other grounds, 133 S.Ct. at 1669″). [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:05 am by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co, 2nd Circuit September 17, 2010 affirmed a trial court dismissal of a case against Oil. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Beth Van Schaack
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013), another corporate complicity case involving the extractive industries in Nigeria. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm by Marta Requejo
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013) [10] Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari; Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid; Salah Hasan Nusaif Al-Ejaili; Asa’ad Hamza Hanfoosh Al Zuba’e v CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by Ryan Scoville
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the Second Circuit reached precisely the opposite conclusion. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013), the court limited the geographic scope of the ATS by applying a version of the presumption against extraterritoriality to ATS causes of action. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm by Marissa Miller
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., scheduled for argument later this month. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:33 am by Andrew Ramonas
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., which involves the Alien Tort Statute, is scheduled for argument on Feb. 28. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., 06-4800-cv, 06-4876-cv (2d Cir. 9/17/10), which we discussed here, among other places. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 620 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010), which held that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear an ATS claim against a corporate defendant for violations of customary international law. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am by Diane Marie Amann
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013) impaired counts based on the Alien Tort Statute; similarly, the Court’s ruling in Mohamad v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. that "corporate liability is not a discernable-much less universally recognized-norm of customary international law that we may apply pursuant to the [Alien Tort Statute]. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. that "corporate liability is not a discernable-much less universally recognized-norm of customary international law that we may apply pursuant to the [Alien Tort Statute]. [read post]