Search for: "Kirk v. United Technologies Corp"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
Ever since the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice Corp v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
NSA whistleblowers Thomas Drake and Kirk Wiebe testified, says Firedoglake. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
With advances in computer technology making genetic testing exponentially cheaper and more detailed as times passes (see Moore’s law), more and more genetic variability in the efficacy of prescription drugs is bound to be discovered. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Corp. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Last week in the courts On 6 March 2023 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Kirk v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
[Added:] One thing I am certain of, though - while being quite unclear about professional responsibility and military lawyering generally - is that criticism implicit and explicit in the article about scholarly writings by military lawyers is wrong; I thought, for example, that Charles Dunlap's 1990s article about the politicization of the officer corps leading to a coup in the form of a fictitious letter was both an outstanding and unusual piece of scholarship, and an entirely… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
