Search for: "Kirsch v. I. R. S" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2007, 11:30 am
RILEY, J., dissents with separate opinion [which begins]: I respectively dissent from the majority because (1) I do not believe Father's request to amend the CHINS petition effectively notified Mother that the threat she posed to V.C. would be an issue at trial, and (2) I believe it was improper to consolidate the CHINS action with Father's paternity and custody action.In Ralph Barnett v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's the Seventh Circuit opinion, which I blogged about 10 days ago, when it came down—Klaassen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Despite the majority's holding to the contrary, I believe this case must be controlled by our decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 10:22 am
Judge Kirsch writes the opinion.On appeal, Insurers raise the following issues: I. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
In so doing, I believe the trial court fully complied with Indiana Code Section 34-47-3-5.In Bryan Carson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:23 am
I respectfully dissent and would affirm the trial court's decision in all respects.Christina Roush v. [read post]