Search for: "Kirsten v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Contents include: Loveday Hodson & Troy Lavers, Feminist Judgments in International Law: An Introduction Christine Chinkin, Gina Heathcote, Emily Jones & Henry Jones, Bozkurt Case, aka the Lotus Case (France v Turkey): Ships that Go Bump in the Night Kasey McCall-Smith, Rhona Smith & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Kathryn Greenman & Troy Lavers, The Lockerbie Case… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
“Relevant filing system” is extremely narrowly defined and would, following Smith v Lloyd Bank Plc [2005] EWHC 246 (Ch), exclude information in “unstructured bundles kept in boxes” even if previously processed electronically. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Louis V. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 pm
The students argued the merits of a fictitious case Brendan Smith v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited (see Part I for background, Part II for the ruling and an easy summary). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm
The top ten posts of the past three months were as follows: What the Defamation Bill means for the internet – Graham Smith News: “Twitter joke” case, rehearing ordered before a three judge court Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll News: Queens Speech – at last the Defamation Bill Case Law: El Naschie v Macmillan – claim… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
.* The Copyright and Technology contest has now a winnerOn 1 October 2014 the London offices of Reed Smith LLP are hosting the 1-day Copyright and Technology conference, which promises to be very engaging and carries a discounted registration fee for IPKat readers. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
By an order sealed on 27 October 2011, Dame Janet Smith granted the Defendants in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley permission to appeal against two decisions of Eady J: on 18 February 2011 ([2011] EWHC 292 (QB)) (striking out defences of justification and fair comment) and 1 July 2011 ([2011] EWHC 1710 (QB)) (refusing permission to serve further amended defences). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Inforrm has a case commentary by Lorna Skinner and Kirsten Sjovoll. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
The Sydney Morning Herald had a piece “Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial delayed”. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
McDonnell, Matthew, Kirsten Engel and Ardeth Barnhart. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Marchant, Matthew McDonnell, Kirsten Engel, Ardeth Barnhart, Joseph P. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
17 Animal L. 415-444 (2011).Balzer, Kirsten S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Joe Manchin and Kirsten Sinema made clear they would not weaken the 60-vote rule, defending it as a tool to protect minority-party rights and promote bipartisanship. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
Kirsten Grieshaber reports for AP News. [read post]
