Search for: "Klein v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
The ALJ ruled that the GPS data was accurate and reliable and that its use did not violate Halpin’s privacy rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(United States) Coty is a global cosmetic company. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  The  US Supreme Court’s decision a couple of weeks back in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm by Elina Saxena
” Here's a seemingly evergreen headline: the United States is urging NATO to play a bigger role in the fight against the Islamic State. [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:32 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidenceCourt Partly Allows Introduction, as Direct Proof, Of Evidence of Defendant's Uncharged Criminal Acts United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:57 pm by Joseph J. Lazzarotti and Maya Atrakchi
  A Ninth Circuit decision supports the CBP’s position, holding that “reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other electric device at the international border” (United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am by Alex R. McQuade
Robert Loeb and Helen Klein examined the Al Razak v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
NYC Board of Education and the UFT agreement addressing the processing of disciplinary charges filed against an educator pursuant to §3020-aThe following is the letter from NYC Department of Education Chancellor Klein to United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew concerning the processing of disciplinary charges filed against a New York City Department of Education educator pursuant to §3020-a of the Education Law. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
Of particular interest to me was an argument based on the venerable-but-never-fully-understood United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]