Search for: "Kling v. State" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Kling (J.D. 2010, Yale) has published Comment, Tax Cases Make Bad Work Product Law: The Discoverability of Litigation Risk Assessments After United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:18 am
" The article states that according to the Judicial Business of the United States Courts:  Annual Report of the Director, tbl. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Kindall James The issue of whether an individual employee is personally liable for oilfield environmental damages was recently addressed in Kling Realty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[ABA Journal] Maryland does not approve of Bitcoin [my Free State Notes via Kevin Funnell] Behind Halliburton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am by Joe Kristan
  Arnold Kling ponders the Hoover presidency: Price V. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Kling, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, May 7, 2021 Tags: Banks, Boards of Directors, Financial institutions, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting How Should Performance Signals Affect Contracts? [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 550… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Wynne, I’m quoted] Dodd-Frank: “Are State Regulators A Source of Systemic Risk? [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 5:36 am by Ralf Michaels
The Paris Climate Agreement and liability issues (Franzius/Kling) J. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am by Natalie L. Reid
Our practice at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP represented WHO as intervenor in that case, as well as in successfully asserting its immunities in Kling v. [read post]