Search for: "Knight v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 5:14 pm
Cavallaro v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
“And thus” – as Christopher Knight remarked – “section 13(2) was no more. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Lloyd addressed the court on the influential case of Markt & Co Ltd V Knight Steamship Co Ltd [1910] 2 KB 1021 (CA) which Google submitted restricted the scope of the representative action mechanism and prevented Lloyd’s case from proceeding. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Similarly, in Knight v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Next week in the courts On Monday 13 July 2015 the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) will hear the Information Commissioner’s appeal in the case of Colenso-Dunne v ICO. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:22 pm
As the federal district court observed in Knight v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
In a statement from MP Julian Knight, the DCMS is said to be “keen to learn more about how Mr. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) and Family Court Act § 413 (1) were amended by Laws of 2011, Ch 436 to correct these anomalies and to codify the decision in Rose v Moody. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court to correct this injustice and overreach of copyright law. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am
Supreme Court to correct this injustice and overreach of copyright law. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
Background: The Schrems II Decision and the End of Privacy Shield The executive order and accompanying DOJ regulations are intended to facilitate a new EU–U.S. data-transfer agreement, following the July 2020 decision by the CJEU in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
