Search for: "Knopf v. Gray"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2018, 11:36 am
In the recent opinion of Knopf v Gray, the Texas Supreme Court instructs as to the essence of a life estate under Texas law. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Special thanks to Howard Knopf for information regarding this case. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Biolitec, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) CAFC: Successor company holds patents assigned to predecessor company (even if assigned after predecessor dissolved): Tri-Star Electronics Int’l. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
