Search for: "Knotts v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 2:18 am
Category: 102    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor     TitleMotorola Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:21 am
That such a surrogate technological deployment is not — particularly when placed at the unsupervised discretion of agents of the state “engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime” (Johnson v United States, 333 US 10, 14 [1948]) — compatible with any reasonable notion of personal privacy or ordered liberty would appear to us obvious. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm by admin
Today the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
This ruling is in in significant tension with United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am by Jay Stanley
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Washington, DC lawyer Scott Knott of The Ferraro Law Firm on their firm's Tax Whistleblower Report Understanding VC Financings - Transaction Costs and Attorney Fees - Seattle lawyer Asher Bearman of DLA Piper on The Venture Alley Little lies employers tell . . . and why they shouldn't - Winston-Salem attorney Robin Shea of Constangy on the firm's blog, Employment & Labor Insider New Energy Grants Help to Expand Alternative Fuel,… [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Giorgio Luceri
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]