Search for: "Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Securities and Exchange Commission, 18-1501. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The deterrent effect of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement intensity on illegal insider trading: evidence from run-up before news events. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission (here) that the disgorgement amount represented a “penalty” as a matter of law, and therefore did not represent covered loss under the policy. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, have been in the area of First Amendment rights, this seemed an appropriate place to start. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission and Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), that the SEC’s ability to recover funds through disgorgement is subject to a five-year statute of limitations. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:02 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that disgorgement in SEC proceedings is subject to the five-year statute of limitations for penalties. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which held that a five-year statute of limitations on SEC actions imposing penalties also applied to actions seeking disgorgement. [read post]