Search for: "Konzelman v. Konzelman" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In contrast with alimony or support awards, a property agreement cannot be adjusted after divorce to reflect unanticipated changes in the parties’ circumstances
28 Apr 2010, 5:26 pm by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The party seeking modification has the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances warranting relief from the support or maintenance obligations
21 Apr 2010, 9:25 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
If a support arrangement provided for the circumstances that are now alleged as changed, it would not ordinarily be equitable and fair to grant modification
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Where the parties have not provided otherwise by agreement, alimony may be modified based on changed circumstances resulting from cohabitation only if one cohabitant supports or subsidizes the other under circumstances sufficient to entitle the supporting
4 Feb 2010, 8:45 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The court may enforce an agreement if it is fair and equitable, but the court’s equitable authority to modify support obligations in response to changed circumstances cannot be restricted
21 Jan 2010, 8:06 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Spousal agreements may condition the cessation of alimony on certain conditions, and they may allow alimony to survive remarriage
16 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
Div., A-5025-07T2, December 16, 2009: Spousal agreements may condition the cessation of alimony on certain conditions, see Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
If the parties have stipulated by agreement that the husband will pay counsel fees to the wife in an amount to be fixed by the court, the court cannot refuse to allow any counsel fees
30 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Super. at 20 (quoting Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Default interest rates, like late fees, are presumed reasonable
30 Jul 2009, 5:06 am
Super. at 20 (quoting Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Cohabitation involves an intimate relationship in which the couple has undertaken duties and privileges that are commonly associated with marriage
24 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Gayet, supra, 92 N.J. at 151; Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Payor’s incarceration is but one factor among others to be weighed by the trial court in determining whether to grant a payor’s request for relief from payment from support obligations while imprisoned
17 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
’” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
For medification to be considered, there must be a point from which change can be measured
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Super. at 372; see Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Cohabitation constitutes a change of circumstances only if coupled with economic consequences
8 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
[Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Are They Living Together or Not?
23 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
  Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
CRESSKILL DIVORCE ARBITRATION
16 Nov 2006, 8:36 am
Moreover, the language of such a clause must be construed reasonably, so as not to reach an absurd result and so as not to ignore the qualification in Konzelman v. [read post]
New Jersey Family Law - http://njdivorceblog.typepad.com/new_jersey_divorce_law_me/
Bench-Slapped! Reinhardt v. Bybee
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
Bench-Slapped! Reinhardt v. Bybee
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/