Search for: "Kowalski v. Kowalski" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:36 pm
However, the court rejected this argument and applied the standard set forth in the Supreme Court case Inwood Laboratories v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Fong (1951) 37 Cal.2d 356, 370, 232 P.2d 241; see Borello, at p. 350, 256 Cal.Rptr. 543, 769 P.2d 399; Kowalski v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, David Kemp discusses the cert. petition in Kowalski v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Barry SookmanInternet justice: Mosley v Google In the landmark ruling in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (case no. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:06 pm
Co. v Kowalski, 222 AD2d 859, 861 [1995]) and that she was a resident of the insured premises at the time of the loss. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:05 am by David Hudson, guest-blogging
Circuit Court of Appeals used this test to find that school officials in West Virginia had the authority to punish a student for objectionable online material in Kowalski v. [read post]