Search for: "Kristin Hickman"
Results 81 - 100
of 268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2020, 1:10 pm
Kristin E. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:05 pm
Following up on my previous post, Justice Thomas, In Lone Dissent, Thrashes Chevron and His Own Brand X Decision: Kristin E. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Rev. 195 (2020) (reviewed by Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) here): Anti-abuse doctrines in tax law have traditionally been formulated as multifactor tests that weigh the facts of the taxpayer’s case but ignore the tax statute at issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
” At Of Interest, Kristin Hickman remarks on Gorsuch’s assertion that “the government had waived Chevron deference,” explaining that “whether the government actually can waive Chevron deference remains an open question. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
In an article in The Regulatory Review, Kristin E. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
at Minnesota today as part of its Perspectives on Taxation Lecture Series hosted by Kristin Hickman: Nearly every state incorporates the federal tax code into its individual income tax system. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:01 am
[Robert VerBruggen, Federalist Society panel video with Ronald Cass, David Schoenbrod, Kristin Hickman, Alan Morrison, Hon. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm
Kristin E. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Gundy, Nondelegation, and Never-Ending Hope July 8, 2019 | Kristin E. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am
U.S. here, here] “From Chevron to ‘Consent of the Governed'” [David Schoenbrod, Cato Regulation magazine; Cato panel discussion video with Adam White, David Doniger, Shapiro and Yeatman; Federalist Society panel discussion video with Mark Chenoweth, Doniger, Kristin Hickman, Schoenbrod, Jennifer Mascott] “Recognizing the Congressional Review Act’s Full Potential” [Jonathan Wood, Federalist Society, earlier] “Idaho is the only state… [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
Kristin Hickman (Minnesota), Refashioning Anti-Abuse Doctrines As Substantive Canons (JOTWELL) (reviewing Jonathan H. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
David Boundy This is a response to Prof. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
Kristin Hickman Jurists and legal scholars who think about methods and approaches for resolving questions of statutory meaning like to talk about traditional tools of statutory interpretation and the metaphorical toolbox in which those tools are kept. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) presents The States Should and Can Conform to GILTI at Minnesota today as part of its Perspectives on Taxation Lecture Series hosted by Kristin Hickman: Corporate income taxes are a critical revenue source for both state governments and the U.S. federal government. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:39 pm
Gundy, Nondelegation, and Never-Ending Hope July 08, 2019 | Kristin E. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:00 am
Tax Prof speakers include: Alice Abreu (Temple) Les Book (Villanova) Lilian Faulhaber (Georgetown) Richard Greenstein (Temple) Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) Stephanie McMahon (Cincinnati) Alan Rozenshtein (Minnesota) Caleb Smith (Minnesota) Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis) For a complete list... [read post]
13 May 2019, 11:00 am
Bloomberg Law, Tax Scholar Leaves White House Regulatory Review Office: Kristin Hickman is no longer working with the White House’s Office of Management and Budget after being hired last year to strengthen its tax expertise. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Hickman, To Repudiate or Merely Curtail? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
In a recent essay in the Minnesota Law Review’s Headnotes, Professor Kristin Hickman of the University of Minnesota Law School and Mark Thomson of Crowell & Moring argued that the practical goals of Auer deference have been steadily weakened by court-imposed limitations and exceptions. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Kristin Hickman In 2011, Chief Justice John Roberts notoriously criticized the legal academy when he declared at a judicial conference, “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]
