Search for: "Krohe v. City of Bloomington" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
City of Bloomington that a catastrophic injury under the Act was the same thing as an injury sufficient to result in a line-of-duty pension, but argued that Krohe was factually distinguishable and wrongly decided. [read post]