Search for: "Kuchta, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Oral Argument Preview: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
If the trial court was wrong in entering final judgment because the Bank had no standing, the Kuchtas should have appealed that judgment. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
The Kuchtas did not raise the standing issue in opposition to the summary judgment motion, and did not appeal the judgment. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
But the Kuchtas did not appeal this judgment. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
Kuchta. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:48 am
Aug. 30, 2010); In re Kuchta, 434, 463 B.R. 837 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 10:30 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:56 am
Kuchta, 2014-Ohio-4275. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
Kuchta, Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-4275. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:16 am
This issue of questioning past foreclosures was at the heart of the Kuchta decision, where the foreclosed homeowners tried to collaterally attack standing in their foreclosure action via a 60(B) motion. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304 was number one. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
Kuchta, 2014-Ohio-4275. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
Kuchta, the Court held that a Civ. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:54 am
Horn appealed pro se, but did not raise the issue of standing. [read post]
