Search for: "Kucker v. Kucker"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
In Kucker v Kucker, it was confirmed that the statute of frauds applied to a trust in real property. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
In Kucker v Kucker, it was confirmed that the statute of frauds applied to a trust in real property. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:53 am
Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP ;2007 NY Slip Op 06026 ;Decided on July 10, 2007 ;Appellate Division, Second Department "The Supreme Court should... [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:14 am
In Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 03514 Decided on May 16, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department defendants called damages speculative. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm
Kucker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:55 am
The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the merits of a defense, rather than merely pointing out gaps in the plaintiff’s proof (see Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 161 AD3d at 960). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:11 am
The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the merits of a defense, rather than merely pointing out gaps in the plaintiff’s proof (see Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 161 AD3d at 960). [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:05 am
Defendants’ vague assertion that they “raised” the issue with plaintiffs is insufficient to create an issue of fact (Kucker & Bruh, LLP v Sendowski, 136 AD3d 475, 476 [1st Dept 2016]; Zanani v Schvimmer, 50 AD3d 445, 446 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977 ["attorney's failure to disclose malpractice does not give rise to a fraud claim separate from the customary malpractice action"]; Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 42 AD3d 436). [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am
“In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
“A defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing a legal malpractice cause of action has the burden of establishing prima facie that he or she did not fail to exercise such skill and knowledge, or that the claimed departure did not proximately cause the plaintiff to sustain damages” (Bakcheva v Law Offs. of Stein & Assoc., 169 AD3d 624, 625; see Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 161 AD3d 959, 960; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698). [read post]
