Search for: "Kumar v American Tr. Ins. Co."
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm
In MODIFYING the order appealed from to grant Allstate's motion to dismiss the breach of contract action, as well, the Fourth Department held: Even accepting all of the facts alleged by plaintiff in his complaint as true and according him the benefit of every favorable inference, as we must in the context of defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 86-87; Kumar v American Tr. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
" Kumar v American Tr. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:35 am
Co., 93 AD2d 337, 341 [1st Dept 1983], affd 61 NY2d 569 [1984]; see also Kumar v American Tr. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
Co., 47 AD3d 52, 59 [1st Dept 2007]; but see Kumar v American Tr. [read post]
