Search for: "Kumar v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
The court determined that: i) The state has a duty to inform the owners that it intends to acquire their property—a right to notice; ii) The state’s obligation to consider objections—the right to hear; iii) The state has a duty to inform its acquisition decision, ensuring the right to a reasoned decision; iv) The state has a duty to demonstrate that the acquisition is for a public cause—acquisitions should only be made for public purposes;… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
Raj Kumar and S.G. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
The ILC’s interpretation of the prosecute or extradite principle aligns with the reasoning of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the 2012 Belgium v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:54 pm
Narasimha Rao v State (CBI/SPE), which granted immunity to such politicians and held that such members of the legislature enjoy immunity from being charged with bribery in relation to the way they vote or speak in the House. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:48 pm
But Wednesday's opinion in Patel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Kumar v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
Art Law cases handled as an Assistant United States Attorney: United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court issued the Dobbs decision, striking down Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
In Kumar v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[x] In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[x] In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Garland, and Kumar v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
How Has Blockchain Technology Fared in China? –from a case study of LRB to the most recent NFT cases
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am
Another difference between R-Space and marketspaces in the United States is that trading between consumers is prohibited. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
Kumar, 404 Ill.App.3d 106, 112, 343 Ill.Dec. 630, 935 N.E.2d 638 (2010). [read post]
