Search for: "Kun v Fulop"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Last month, in a case called Kun v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
In the absence of any stock certificate, a court must examine other available evidence to determine the validity of a putative shareholder’s claim (see Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d at 833; Hunt v Hunt, 222 AD2d 759, 760). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
Aside from stock certificates, courts may consider any and all “other available evidence” to determine “whether a putative shareholder in fact and law enjoys that status” (Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d 832 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
In other instances, such as in Bombard and in another case I wrote about last year called Kun v. [read post]
