Search for: "Kurt James" Results 21 - 40 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 2:04 am
Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Kurt Lash's Majoritarian Difficulty (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:52 am by Buce
   A more interesting comparison might be James Gould Cozzens (whom Myers claims to have read in the sixth grade). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
New from the University Press of Kentucky: Writing the Legal Record: Law Reporters in Nineteenth-Century Kentucky, by Kurt X. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
Harlan’s father, James Harlan, was a former Kentucky Attorney General and Congressman as well as an avid book collector. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:50 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
James Wilson believed there was a difference, as did the framers. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:15 am by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is 'Resolution VI': The Virginia Plan and Authority to Resolve 'Collective Action Problems' Under Article I, Section 8 by Kurt T. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 5:18 am
The Download of the Week is Popular Sovereignty, Originalism, and Reverse Stare Decisis by Kurt Lash. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Vice Chancellor agreed with Tom James’ argument, notwithstanding the fact that Tom James was aware of the assignment when it occurred and treated the assignee as a member, and therefore held that the petitioners lacked standing to seek judicial dissolution under Section 18-802. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
 By Robert Milligan, Kurt Kappes and James McNairy The California Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Pete Ladig is Vice Chair of the Corporate and Commercial Litigation Group at Morris James also in Wilmington. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Kurt Lash (Richmond), who is a leading legal historian of the Fourteenth Amendment, was kind enough to pass along this response to an amicus brief by Profs. [read post]