Search for: "L. A. City Sch. Dist. v. State Board Equalization" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 [*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist.… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 [*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist.… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
App’x 729 (10th Cir. 2014) (joined opinion) Sentence enhancement for sexual contact does not violate Commerce Clause Tarrant Reg’l Water Dist. v. [read post]