Search for: "L. Koenig" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 5:43 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Walker and Scott MacGuidwin (98 Notre Dame Law Review forthcoming) The Roberts Court’s Functionalist Turn in Administrative Law by Thomas Koenig and Ben Pontz (46 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy forthcoming) Unheralded and Transformative: The Test for Major Questions After West Virginia by Natasha Brunstein and Donald L. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 4:06 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Hickman (Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis forthcoming) Statutory Interpretation and Agency Disgorgement Power by Caprice L. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
Well, soon the pandemic of Trump Flu will come to a close. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:38 am by F. Tim Knight
THomas School of Law, Melissa Love Koenig, Associate Professor of Legal Writing, Marquette University Law School, Amy Vorenberg, Clinical Professor, Director of Legal Writing, University of New Hampshire School of Law Legal Research and The Duty of Technology Competence: Regulating Algorithms in Law / Jamie J. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:25 am by Juvan Bonni
Duane Morris LLP Volpe and Koenig, P.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Koenig (July 26, 2016), the debtors sought to exempt three annuities with a value of $292,185.97. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Koenig (July 26, 2016), the debtors sought to exempt three annuities with a value of $292,185.97. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Koenig (July 26, 2016), the debtors sought to exempt three annuities with a value of $292,185.97. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
I blogged two weeks ago about a First Amendment challenge to California Penal Code § 9026.5, which makes it a crime to rebroadcast televised California Assembly proceedings “for any political or commercial purpose, including, but not limited to, any campaign for elective public office or any campaign supporting or opposing a ballot proposition submitted to the electors. [read post]