Search for: "LAMER v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
Support for this conclusion may be found in Dagenais v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:34 pm
In LaMere v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 11:30 am
This was described in the case of R v Sanaee, 2015 ABCA 224 which stated that there will be few if any, circumstances where one can rely on colour of right to defend against animal cruelty charges. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
Although the Court in R. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
R. v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
Davidson, 1989 CanLII 92 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1038, at p. 1078, per Lamer J. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
Lamere DA 18-0087 2020 MT 145N Criminal – Municipal Court Appeal Ascencio v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
In Valente v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Graat v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:01 am
Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
Though commonly referred to as simply “freedom of speech,” the Charter‘s expressive guarantee under s. 2(b) is slightly more refined as, freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; Justice Lamer, in discussing the role of the media in light of competing interests such as the right to a fair trial, stated in Dagenais v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
” Such critics included then Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, former Chief Justice Antonio Lamer and the Canadian Judicial Council. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm
3, 5 and 7 of the EIPA and the Export Control List, and the Geneva Conventions Act, applying for judicial review in 2017 in Turp v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
The description of the infringing add-ons explicitly states that they are developed and/or supported by TVAddons. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 8:15 pm
Justice Lamer stated, While the existence of a formal practice of “confession” may well be a strong indication that the parties expected the communication to be confidential, the lack of such a formal practice is not, in and of itself, determinative. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
