Search for: "LANCE v. SMITH" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 7:10 am
Smith (08-351), on the right to a court hearing to challenge a forfeiture order for a drug crime; McDaniel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:36 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"  Yeah, sounds like Neil; never one to shy away from high-stakes criminal defense litigation.The Michigan Court of Appeals handed prosecutors a serious weapon when it issued its People v McQueen decision last month. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
  Full disclosure:  David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court – constitutionality/remittitur of punitive damages in bifurcated action·                     Smith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Representing Appellant Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon)   Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance)   Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]