Search for: "LANDMARK LEGAL FOUNDATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
This blog post was largely based on the Pacific Legal Foundation’s amicus brief in support of a petition of certiorari in Loper Bright v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of Justice spells out the duties of the Attorney General: Represent the United States in legal matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
After graduation from law school, she worked on the landmark case Madrigal v. [read post]
Symposium: “Schrödinger’s tax” is dead – and the command to buy health insurance is unconstitutional
9 Nov 2020, 6:28 am
Matthew Forys is the associate general counsel and chief of staff at the Landmark Legal Foundation. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
Two other cases were not decided until after the War Department had concluded that internment was no longer a military necessity. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
The Justice Department, joined separately by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In 1961, the Department of Justice sued to block the merger of the second- and third-largest banks in Philadelphia. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Department of Public Health. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
In Carson v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:27 am
However, in the landmark 2006 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Highlights Legal Risks for Trump Yahoo News – Alan Feuer and Glenn Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 6/29/2022 The extent to which the Justice Department’s expanding criminal inquiry into the insurrection at the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:16 am
Government may afford religious institutions exemptions from certain laws in order to protect religious freedom, but is not constitutionally required to, according to the landmark case of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Enacted as part of the landmark 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, this provision was designed to root out discriminatory quotas in immigration policy. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, was already positioned to be one of the highest-profile arguments of the 2021-22 term, because the state had specifically asked the court to overrule its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Wen Fa discusses the theory of disparate impact liability, at issue next month in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
