Search for: "LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Of the current Iowa fence statute, Iowa Code ch. 359A, the Iowa Supreme Court has stated, “It is difficult to imagine a more deeply rooted Iowa statutory provision. [read post]
Of the current Iowa fence statute, Iowa Code ch. 359A, the Iowa Supreme Court has stated, “It is difficult to imagine a more deeply rooted Iowa statutory provision. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 1982, he blocked the construction of a proposed six-lane highway on the West Side of Manhattan on environmental grounds. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
  President Dwight Eisenhower designated respondent the International Finance Corporation, which is composed of 184 member countries, as an “international organization” under IOIA. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The only prior appellate decision to characterize the right to an accounting in similar terms is a First Department decision over three decades earlier in Koppel v Wien, Lane & Malkin, 125 AD2d 230 [1st Dept 1986], cited in the Webster decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
S. 1, 11 (1931)), and approved a construction of the term "composition of matter" consistent with common usage, see Chakrabarty, supra, at 308 (citing Shell Development Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
In re Bird Brain (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are PARK LANE and PARK AVENUE confusingly similar for footwear? [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” As best I can tell, there are now exactly seven appeals court decisions from three of the four Departments of the Appellate Division explicitly adopting this rule of construction of contract indemnification provisions to cover intra-party disputes unless otherwise specified in the agreement: In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig.WSA Group, PE., PC v DKI Eng’g & Consulting USA PC (178 AD3d 1320 [3d Dept 2019])Crown Wisteria, Inc. v Cibani (178… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]