Search for: "LASD" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by eileen peck
Fraud charges for former LASD DeputyA former Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputy faces charges of fraud. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:04 pm by David Urban
  It filed a lawsuit seeking to prohibit the LASD from disclosing the names of deputies on the list to anyone outside the LASD, absent full compliance with the Pitchess statutes. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by eileen peck
Theft of $120,000 Linked To LASD TraineeA Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department trainee faces grandtheft related to an ATM heist. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:14 am by Center for Internet and Society
In short, as the trial court observed, "Members of the public would be justifiably concerned about LAPD or LASD releasing information regarding the specific locations of their vehicles on specific dates and times to anyone. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (LASD) estimates that it records between 1.7 and 1.8 million license plates per week. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:59 am by karen
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) collect, on average, three million plate scans every week and have amassed a database of half a billion records. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
 Prosecutors, the Court of Appeal holds, not only have no duty to obtain this information, but the LASD cannot even voluntarily provide it to prosecutors. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:34 am by Cannabis Law Group
Additional Resources: CanPay Debuts First Legitimate Debit Payment System For Cannabis Purchases, Nov. 17, 2016, By Debra Bochardt, Forbes.com More Blog Entries: LASD Seizes $7M Worth of Marijuana, Edibles in Canyon County Strip Mall, Nov. 4, 2016, L.A. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:11 am by Cannabis Law Group
Additional Resources: LASD Marijuana Task Force Seizes $6.2+ Million Worth of Marijuana Plants, Product, Cookies – Canyon Country, Oct. 19, 2016, LASD More Blog Entries: California Marijuana Company Prevails After Police Raid, July 12, 2016, L.A. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm by Cyrus Farivar
” The previous day, the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (LASD) had brought in a helicopter equipped with an infrared camera overhead, and a personnel carrier was set up in front of him. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 12:06 pm by Neumann Law Group
Likewise, LASD homicide detective Jeff Cochran indicated that as soon as the jail deputy learned of the asthma attack, he sped to retrieve the inhaler and call for the paramedics. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:28 pm by Tom Smith
An investigation was underway on Friday afternoon after possible human remains and animal parts were found at a strip mall in Compton, authorities said. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:16 am by Dave Maass
They were provided by LASD, and they query LAPD’s databases. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:06 pm by Karen Gullo
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) collect, on average, three million plate scans every week and have amassed a database of half a billion records. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
LASD retains the data for two years, although it would prefer to retain the data indefinitely. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 10:30 am by Dave Maass
For EFF's appeal: https://www.eff.org/document/alpr-records-appeal-eff-aclu-v-lapd-lasd For more information: https://www.eff.org/foia/automated-license-plate-readers Contacts: Jennifer Lynch    Senior Staff Attorney    Electronic Frontier Foundation    jlynch@eff.org Share this:   ||  Join EFF [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:54 am by Dave Maass and Jeremy Gillula
(While LAPD and LASD also claim the public’s right to privacy as a reason for withholding the records, the data can be anonymized easily with a few clicks, either by deleting a column for the spreadsheet or replacing the plates with random numbers.) [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:31 pm by Dave Maass
When we took LAPD and LASD to court, the agencies came back with a stunning argument that they were allowed to withhold this information because 100 percent of the data constituted investigative records, which are exempted from disclosure under California’s open records law. [read post]