Search for: "LEMMON v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
The law only applies to private employers that have at least 20 employees; today in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:55 am
Today, the Supreme Court granted in cert. in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
First up is Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
” Citing Kelly v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
United States, 353 U.S. 346 (1957). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
Lemmon Pharmacal Co., 208 A.2d 283, 285-86 (Pa. 1965); Henderson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Lemmon Pharmacal Co., 208 A.2d 283, 283 (Pa. 1965). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Lemmon, 2013 U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:05 am
Lemmon, 2013 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:35 am
In the case of Lemmons v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
The style of this case is Garry Jenkins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am
In sum, its applicability is generally a question for the trier of fact (People v Lemmons, supra, pp 511-512), as is the applicability of the exception for a weapon found on the person (see People v Lemmons, supra, p 511; cf. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:54 am
(3) McMahon v. [read post]
