Search for: "LEVINE et al v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
The suit stemmed from a claim that Google’s algorithms recommended Islamic State videos to users, leading to the death of an American who was killed when followers of the Islamic State attacked in Paris.In December 2022, LPR Attorney and Shareholder Kim Adams, filed Brief of Amici Curiae Counter Extremism Project (CEP) and Hany Farid in Support of Petitioners in re: Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Levine, Director of the Jewish Law Institute and Professor of Law (more on that here). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Levine, Director of the Jewish Law Institute and Professor of Law. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
Zuckerberg, et al., 2021 WL _______ (Del. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
District Court with subject matter jurisdiction.INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Plaintiff,v.WILLIAM NASH, ET AL., Defendants.No. 3:18-cv-464-G-BN.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
