Search for: "LIBERATION NEWSPAPER v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2015, 1:42 am
Ferras; United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of Baroness Lawrence and ors v Associated Newspapers before Nicklin J. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On 8 December 2023, judgment was handed down in The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 22 January 2019 there was a PTR in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Citing Roe itself and an earlier article of her own (which, in turn, cited newspaper articles from the 1970s), Ginsburg claimed in the lecture that, left more to their own devices, state legislatures would have liberalized their abortion laws. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
They included Harry Blackmun, praised by liberals today as the author of the Court’s abortion decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
Nearly two weeks have passed since the Department of Justice filed a controversial brief in Smelt v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Optical Express Ltd & ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd before Warby J. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
According to Plaintiffs, it wasn’t until the mother of one of the boys contacted an agent of the Department of Homeland Security, who initiated contact with Twitter and requested the removal of the material, that Twitter finally took down the posts, nine days later. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
The Judge handed down a judgment dealing with access to documents and anonymity (R (On the Application Of the Duke of Sussex) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin)). [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am
And note the ACLU’s endorsement of aggressive, recent efforts by the Department of Education to crack down on harassment, broadly defined, without regard for free speech. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:59 am
” Carter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
He concludes If newspapers are doing their job, they should hold other newspapers to account. [read post]
