Search for: "LIGHT V SBA" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 4:18 pm by Nirav Bhatt and Bijal Vira
With respect to PPP borrowers who applied for and received loans in an original principal amount of $2 million or greater, the SBA notes that such PPP borrowers may still have “an adequate basis for making the required good-faith certification, based on their individual circumstances in light of the language of the certification and SBA guidance. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:23 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
Department of Treasury (Treasury), that 75% is an appropriate percentage in light of the CARES Act’s overarching focus on keeping workers paid and employed. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:40 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
  The SBA reasoned that the $20 million cap is necessary in light of the high demand for PPP loans by eligible businesses and to preserve the finite funds available under the PPP. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
Circuit also dismissed a petition for review in National Chicken Council v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm by Marty Lederman
So why, exactly, did the Court so easily, and unanimously, conclude that SBA had standing to challenge the Ohio law – particularly in light of its decision last Term in Clapper v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am by Stephanie Ellis
SBA requires that 8(a) Program applicants demonstrate “reasonable prospects for success in competing in the private sector if admitted to the 8(a) BD program,” which is reasonable in light of the additional benefits 8(a) Program participants receive. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:35 pm by ANGELA CHAO
    Related posts:Fire Evacuation of Building Puts Freeze on ITAP 2d Circuit Review: Connecticut v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm by Stephanie Ellis
A couple of weeks ago, I explored the Court of Federal Claims case of SH Synergy, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Issues (iv) and (v) The court left these issues for future determination and further submissions and it said that the parties may be able to reach agreement without further argument on those issues. [read post]