Search for: "LIVINGSTON v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by David Bernstein
I have yet to see any British "anti-Zionist" leftist respond to an "As a Jew" by stating something along the line of, "I appreciate your anti-Israel sentiment, but as a good anti-racist I don't recognize Jewish ethnicity. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Livingston and Droney) says it does not matter.For Horton, due process may be realized post-hearing, when he can file an Article 78 petition in state court. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
”Under this new framework, plaintiff states a claim against the landlord, and the lawsuit is reinstated.In dissent Judge Livingston writes that "The majority justifies its novel and expansive theory of landlord liability for tenant-on-tenant harassment by invoking the 'broad language' of the FHA. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
  Mossoff's article is written in the wake of Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:57 pm by Mark Tabakman
She stated that the Judge Furman was correct in looking towards the Second Circuit’s recent holding in Cheeks v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:23 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
New York granted a monopoly on steamboat traffic in that state's waters to Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]